The pizza store is accepting pesos because
it is related to utility. The utility for the buyer to buy pizza increase if
they can pay pesos instead of U.S. dollar, this is because that most of the
buyers who pay pesos are Mexican which they don’t have U.S. dollar. This is
meaning that if the pizza store doesn’t allow them to pay with pesos, many buyers
will not buy it because they don’t have U.S. dollar and is not convenient. This
is also related to consumer preference, the Mexican will be more willing to pay
for pizza with pesos instead of U.S. dollar because that’s their money. They
will think that is not convenient to change their money to U.S. dollar. The
exchange rate can cause Pizza Patron to either lose money or gain money base on
the exchange rate between U.S. dollar and pesos. If pesos money is good at a
certain time, Pizza Patron will earn a little bit more than usual because they
can exchange more U.S. dollar with pesos compare to usual. The budget line will
be affect and shift the curve either right or left depend on the exchange rate.
I think accepting pesos is a good choice because first, it can increase the
utility for Mexican to buy pizza from them and the income might be greater if
the exchange rate is good.
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Saturday, October 20, 2012
Topic 11: Brand Names and Utility
Most people are very dependent on the brand
names. Even though that the products is not that goods, people will still buy
it just because of their brand name. This related to the idea of utility. The
wants people want for the brand name can be the utility of it. People want
brand name is because is either that they think is cool and want to show off in
front of other people or think that is a symbol of wealth and richness. Brand
names will greatly increase the chance of people buying the product which also
increase the satisfaction and the utility of people for the brand name. This is
related to consumer preference because that the products might not be good as
their quality. However, some people will still buy it for the brand name
instead of the quality. These are all personal preference bases on if people
like the brand names or care the brand names or not. There are a great
difference between non brand names products and products with brand names for
some people. For example if there are two products that are exactly the same
but one with brand name and one without. People will choose the one with brand
name more if the name is famous and people like it. Brand names will definitely
bring more utility to people. For example many people like the brand name LV,
which there are many bags that are alike with the LV bags. However, people will
most likely buy the one with LV on it than the non grand one.
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Topic 10: Consumer Preference and Utility
The main targets for Skechers are people
who are in the age between 12 and 24. Skechers assess consumer utility by many
ways. One of the examples is that they will post their information about shoes
in the magazine covers and have advertisement on television. You can see that
magazine and television are source that young people between the ages of 12 to
24 will watch and look at. The strategy they use is that they will try to make
their products best they can and put advertisement to let the young people see
it. Then they will ask the young people to give feedback and they will try to
fix and make their shoes better base on the young people’s feedback. The innovation
Skechers might have that can compete with others is that they might be specific
about what type of shoes they are making. For example, if they are good at
making tennis shoes, they might have a shop beside the tennis field. I don’t
think that the strategy they use will influence my utility because I am a
person that will not care about who is making the products. I just buy one that
I feel most comfortable. I have high utility on computers because right now we
are doing most of the works on computer. This means that buying a good computer
is important for us and also because that I play games and edit video which
might need better computer and I will be willing to pay more than other
products. I don’t get why do people buy like famous brand beg that will cost
around 40 thousands NT or maybe more. It’s just not worth the money to buy a
such expensive beg that just have the same function as normal begs.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Topic 9: The Myth of Outsourcing's Effect
The comparative advantage of globalization
is that a country is most likely to find either labors or products that are
cheaper from other countries. Outsourcing are the labors, goods or any
products that are from other countries. The comparative advantage of
globalization is strongly related to outsourcing because the main advantage of
globalization is that people can get what they want for a cheaper price. This
is all because outsourcing, every county have their own products and what they
are good at. Open economy is an economy in which there are economic activities
between domestic community and outside. Production and efficiency is related to
outsourcing because the price of producing something might be cheaper if it’s
import from other countries. When the price of production decrease, the
production will become more efficient. Without outsourcing, the cost of
producing something will increase. This is because the production will be more
expensive base on the labor and the tools that they use to produce product will
be more expensive. Outsourcing relate to the concept of opportunity costs
because when outsourcing occurs, people start to work for other countries and
people from other countries come to our country to find jobs. Therefore, the unemployed
rate increase and cost the increase of opportunity costs. The marginal product
of labor with outsourcing will be greater than the marginal product of labor
without outsourcing because the price for labor with outsourcing will be
cheaper.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Topic 8: Debate on Globalization
Globalization is helping the world’s
economic grow and created many opportunities of job for the people. Also
another definition for globalization is the interaction or trading between
people from different countries. There are many benefits for globalization for example;
it created more jobs for people, improve the technology, lower the certain
products’ price, more consumer choices. The cost of globalization is that
people in a country might relay on other countries’ products and cause the
country to have zero productions. Also that another cost is that people in a
certain country might lose their own country’s identity. Western people all
think that people in China and India work for little amount of money. However
the wage for Chinese and Indian are way above the minimum wage in their
countries. Globalization affects my life very much. Almost everything I used in
my life come from other countries. Also because of globalization, we are able
to search information about other countries. If there is no globalization, then
I can only use the products that come from Taiwan. Food, computer and
everything will be gone because it’s all made in other countries. Globalization
affects s Taiwan a lot too. If there are no globalizations, Taiwan will be a
crappy place because most of the products are come from other countries. People
in Taiwan will get affect a lot because they can’t do anything. People can only
work for jobs that are for Taiwan products and buy Taiwan product only.
Friday, October 5, 2012
Topic 7: Government Farm Subsidies
The video talks about that the government’s
subsidies go to farmer who earn less than one-quarter million per year. The
produces’ point of view is that they do not support farm subsidies. This is
because that the main people who are getting the money or benefits from it are
the rich farmers. The poor farmers which the subsidies are supposed to help do
not get the subsidies. Many people decide to leave the situation basically
because they can’t survive in that situation anymore; the government is not
helping them. I agree with what the producers said because the main suppose for
the government’s subsidies is to help the poor people which in this case it
only help the rich people. This is helping the situation, so I do not support
farm subsidies. I think one subsidy might help the poor formers is that the
government increase the minimum prices for agricultural produce. There are other
industries that need subsidy such as medicine and Junk food. I think education need
to receive subsidy because therefore, schools can have better quality because
they have more money. Also everyone is paying the tax, so it encourages
everyone to get education because if they do not get education, they might
think that they are wasting money. People who do not have school-aged children will
have to paid for tax to support schools as well, because education is like one
of the most important requirement for the whole world.
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Topic 6: Opportunity Cost of a College Education
Marginal analysis is when people are
comparing marginal benefits and marginal costs. It’s used in a good decision because
it’s a good decision when the marginal benefit is greater than the marginal
costs. The marginal benefits of learn one more years of higher education is
that people can get paid higher in future job. The marginal cost of learning
one more year of higher education is the time and the money you can get during
the time you study.
It’s
not accurate that college graduate earn $1 million more than those non-graduated.
This is because according to statistic, non-graduated learn higher or about the
same as the college graduate student.
Students
decide to leave college after one year of education because that the marginal benefits
of learning one more year of college education is only the few growth of their
money in the future job or non growth in money for the future. However the marginal
costs of learning one more year is that they need to pay the money for the
college and the time and money they can get if they don’t take one more year of
college.
The
information in the video is somewhat related to what my parents told me. Both
talk about the benefits of going to college. I change my thought of going to
college after watching this video. Before, I think that going to college will
greatly increase the income of your future job, but after watching this video.
I realize that there’s not much change about going to college.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)